The First District has weighed in on a district split regarding whether the Hague Service Convention permits service of a complaint and summons by regular mail, and finds that it does.
Commentary on cases, decisions, and orders in and from the Ohio Supreme Court and courts of appeals from attorney Jeff Nye. Not affiliated with any court.
Wednesday, December 7, 2016
Tuesday, December 6, 2016
Third District: parking lot hole is open and obvious
Honestly, this decision is unremarkable except for its name: Howard v. Meat City, Inc. "Meat City" sounds delightful.
Monday, December 5, 2016
Brief filed: Fisher v. Doe
In October I criticized the First District's decision in Fisher v. Doe because it declined to adopt and apply the Dendrite test, which provides rules for when an anonymous speaker can be unmasked. Doe has appealed the decision to the Ohio Supreme Court, and today Tom Haren and I filed an amicus brief in support of jurisdiction, on behalf of our client Alexandria Goddard. Alex was the blogger who earned fame (or, perhaps, notoriety) in 2012 for investigating and blogging the social media posts made by students attending a party at which two Steubenville High School football players raped a teenaged girl.
Our brief can be read here. In it Tom and I urge the Court to recognize that both the Ohio and US Constitutions protect the rights to speak anonymously and remain anonymous, and that the Dendrite test is best suited to protecting those constitutional rights, while still allowing for meritorious claims to proceed. Most importantly, Dendrite requires plaintiffs to make a showing of merit before unmasking the anonymous speaker. Any rule that allows unmasking before a demonstration of the existence of a meritorious claim improperly prioritizes a common law claim (defamation) over a constitutional right (anonymity).
The plaintiff's response to the jurisdictional briefs is due in January.
Update: the Court has declined jurisdiction in the case.
Our brief can be read here. In it Tom and I urge the Court to recognize that both the Ohio and US Constitutions protect the rights to speak anonymously and remain anonymous, and that the Dendrite test is best suited to protecting those constitutional rights, while still allowing for meritorious claims to proceed. Most importantly, Dendrite requires plaintiffs to make a showing of merit before unmasking the anonymous speaker. Any rule that allows unmasking before a demonstration of the existence of a meritorious claim improperly prioritizes a common law claim (defamation) over a constitutional right (anonymity).
The plaintiff's response to the jurisdictional briefs is due in January.
Update: the Court has declined jurisdiction in the case.
Monday, November 28, 2016
Brief filed: Stewart v. Vivian
Today we filed a merits brief in the Ohio Supreme Court on behalf of the appellant in Stewart v. Vivian. You can read the brief here. The supplement is here.
Supreme Court elections official
First District judges Pat Fischer and Pat DeWine have officially won the elections for the seats being vacated by Justices Paul Pfeiffer and Judith Ann Lanzinger, respectively. Fischer narrowly defeated Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Judge John O'Donnell--O'Donnell only conceded the race this past week--and will be sworn in on January 1. DeWine, who earned a sizeable victory over Judge Cynthia Rice of the Eleventh District, will be sworn in on January 2.
Fifth District: procedendo issued
The Fifth District has issued a writ of procedendo requiring the Morgan County Common Pleas Court to rule on the relator's petition for post-conviction relief. The motion was filed in August 2015 and had not yet been ruled on, despite Superintendence Rule 40(A)(3)'s requirement that motions be resolved within 120 days of filing. The court did observe that litigants have no private right to enforce that rule, but the rule nevertheless bears upon the question of whether the court "has unduly delayed" in issuing a ruling. The case is State ex rel. Smoot v. Favreau.
Tuesday, November 15, 2016
Supreme Court grants ANOTHER writ of prohibition against Judge Robert Ruehlman
For the second time in five months, the Supreme Court has granted a writ of prohibition against Hamilton County Common Pleas Court Judge Robert P. Ruehlman.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)