The reason being, of course, that motions for reconsideration of a final judgment simply don't exist under the Civil Rules. Denials of motions for reconsideration therefore can't be final orders, and the court of appeals has no jurisdiction over appeals from non-final orders.
But there is a lot more going on in this case.
Commentary on cases, decisions, and orders in and from the Ohio Supreme Court and courts of appeals from attorney Jeff Nye. Not affiliated with any court.
Monday, March 27, 2017
Friday, March 17, 2017
More on Belton, Aalim, and disqualifications
In an earlier post I promised more on Belton, Aalim, and related issues. In particular, I want to discuss how the Court, and in particular new Justices Patrick Fischer and Pat DeWine, are handling some unusual procedural issues.
Wednesday, March 15, 2017
Wednesday, March 8, 2017
Poor Thomas Warren
At first glance Tom Warren might not be an obvious candidate for your sympathy. He's a partner at Baker Hostetler, where he's the leader of its appellate defense group. Graduate of Harvard College and Stanford Law, former federal prosecutor, adjunct professor at three law schools...
Wednesday, February 22, 2017
Supreme Court case announcements, 2/22/17
The Supreme Court has announced the acceptance of five new cases (though only three were placed on the active docket). All five cases involve review of decisions from the Eighth District.
Tuesday, February 14, 2017
What authority does the Clerk of Courts have to reject a filing?
Not as much as some clerks seem to think, says the Fifth District in State ex rel. Kess v. Antonoplos.
Monday, February 6, 2017
Brief filed: Stewart v. Vivian
Today we filed our reply brief in the Ohio Supreme Court on behalf of the appellant in Stewart v. Vivian. You can read the brief here.
Stewart relates to the proper interpretation of section 2317.43 of the Revised Code. The docket is here. Our merits brief was filed in November, and the appellee's brief was filed last month.
The case is scheduled for argument on Thursday, April 6.
Stewart relates to the proper interpretation of section 2317.43 of the Revised Code. The docket is here. Our merits brief was filed in November, and the appellee's brief was filed last month.
The case is scheduled for argument on Thursday, April 6.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)